Category: Dating and Relationships
Hi all,
Wasn't sure where to put this lol so I put it here. Copied this from an rl friend who gave the interview in the first place. The illustration is of a girl, sitting on a bed wearing a tigress costume and looking very pissed off.
http://t.co/1O39CVQroX
enjoy? Or...something?
I fail to see what's so bad about this article. Alternative, sure. Would I do it, no. Is it weird or bad or unacceptable or harmful, absolutely not.
When you're tempted to judge someone for something you find unusual, keep in mind that to many people just about everything you do is unusual.
No no, I didn't say it was wrong or harmful...usual is just defined as that which we do not usually, as in habitually, experience. That was literally the only way I meant the word to be taken.
Well, interesting indeed. If he's happy, I'm happy. He's not hurting anyone but the girl that gets mad about him and his companions,and she can always leave.
this is definitely interesting; thanks for sharing it.
I wouldn't do it, but if that's what makes him happy, good for him.
Hey, of all the things he could be slipping his sausage into, I'd rather it be a stuffed animal. It could be a little girl, or someone who wasn't willing. I'd much rather it be his pet tiger.
And really, think about this. Is this really alternative? How many girls, and you can be honest here, have sex with an inanimate object? Is it really so different for him to have sex with a stuffed animal when girls stick vibrating rubber toys into their vaginas on a frequent basis? What's the difference?
The only difference I can think of is a dildo is purpose built for sex, whereas a stuffed animal is not. But then, I know girls who use carrots and toothbrushes and showerheads. Those aren't purpose built for sex. So are they different? I honestly don't see it as being any different.
Lol a lot of interesting responses here. Basically the same things I said when he came out to me. That mag posted rather a lot of alternative type things like this.
Cody made a good point. it's really not that alternative, considering what some girls use to get off.
Let us not forget the boys now. Beds, rubber toys, dalls, sand paper.
I didn't see where he was sticking himself in to the stuffed toys, more like a rub-up?
wait...sandpaper? yikes?
And his companions are modded with fabric inserts into their bodies.
Jesus, sandpaper? The fuck kind of masturbation are you doing over there?
that's what I was wondering. wow, Wayne.
I didn't say I did, but have read accounts of guys that can't pass the home Depot without getting a hard on. Seems that 130 grade and higher wetted makes some feel like they are in a dry woman. Ouch, but there you go.
Ouuuuuuuuch. Sandpaper? That's more like a rubRaw not a rubUp. lol. Oh man, what kind of sadist would do that. Daaaamn.
Why would you want to be in a dry woman? I personally prefer it when the woman is wet, both for pleasure and so I know she's not completely turned off by the sight of me naked. There is only one time that a dry woman is the correct setting for sex, and even that should be fixed with lube before you insert your penis.
Ask the man in line with the big smile at the Home Depot and the light weight sand paper.
Okay, I was looking for a site to post for this san paper business. I located videos, but that wasn’t good enough, so I found the favorite place and just had to laugh.
Masturbating with Sandpaper while Watching the Discovery Channel
is on Facebook.
To connect with Masturbating with Sandpaper while Watching the Discovery Channel, sign up for Facebook today.
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Masterbating-with-Sandpaper-while-Watching-the-Discovery-Channel/113508708690564
On that page.
Now, I wonder how elaborate these companions can be made, and how elaborate this buys companions are?
Does he have them purr? Are they made of fur, not stuffed animal cottons?
Here in Colorado you can buy a bear skin, and…. *sigh*
lol. I can ask if you want! :d
Do it! Post it! I wannna know. Lol
Hi all, Firstly, I showed my friend this topic...he was so surprised that no negative comments wewe made...actually I must admit I was also. To answer the questions, no they don't purr, although apparently that would be, quote, fucking awesome if they did. Normal fur is too thin and not durable enough so he doesn't go for that, just normal stuffed animals. Apparently mods can be quite elaborate on some, like long hair, ETC but he can't sew for shit so he went for the simple vaginal and oral mods using some material or other. There ya go, sex-crazed minds satisfied? :d
No, I now want to know if he has ever visited www.bigplush.com. If he hasn't, he should.
Easy to make one purr. Put some sort of vibrator inside. I've seen these at Toys R Us even. You squeeze them and they virbrate, so I'd say nothing difficult to get?
I am thinking his companions are modified to some extent anyway, so?
This is honestly disgusting in my opinion but nothing surprises me anymore.
yay! The first negative poster! lol it took this long?
Ok, why is it disgusting to you?
Hmm I can say why this one puts me off personally. Though first I would say it's certainly harmless to those who want to do it. Can't be dealing in issues of consent since we're talking inanimate objects.
I should think stuffed animals even if modded, would become quite unclean after sexual use.
Personally I find stuffed animals distasteful and that is an understatement. Not even sexually just in general. I just hate the things is all.
So there ya go, a personal anecdotal response to finding it distasteful.
That's just my own feeling for myself though. I wouldn't share the bed with those things, sexually or otherwise. But there's no real harm in it, if it's just their thing I guess.
Perhaps ot the hateful response you might have guessed from someone not into it, but I and my likes am not the sum total of the universe, so.
humans in general don't always use things for their intended purposes. People have sex in the shower. There is no rule saying that having sex in a shower is illegal. With that said, I'm with Leo in saying I couldn't ever get turned on by a stuffed animal. Different strokes for different folks.
As far as the sandpaper, that's a new one. That certainly takes the saying I like it rough to a whole new level, ey?
is there anyway you can maybe repost the link or something, as i cannot get my internet to open that page. it says it does not exist. thanks
um this is the URL:
http://sensanostra.com/sweet-dreams-of-stuffed-tigers/
MJ
Oh I couldn't get turned on by one either, but then I couldn't get turned on by a guy either. That doesn't mean I think homosexuality is disgusting. Its just not something I find attractive.
I agree with the person who talked about the carrit thing. althoe that would be kind of a bad thing if the tyger were alive slight smile
Not intending to demean those who enjoy this type of sexual activity.
But the comparison to homosexuality isn't really valid. Homosexuals, polyamorous people, heterosexuals and others all get something out of the bonding effects between humans. Something that has probably solidified some important aspects of human evolution. So no, I don't care what he or they do in their homes with stuffed animals. I simply have my own, perhaps irrational, distaste for the things, just as many have distaste for spiders, snakes and mice.
Interestingly though, birds use tree branches for masturbatory tools - rubbing the cloaca (vent) against a branch for sexual stimulation. Dogs, although not so much wolves, will hump things for the same reason. Certain simian (ape) species have been known to orally rape frogs even.
So the practices mentioned by the OP cannot technically even be called unnatural.
Repulsive to many of us perhaps. And just as they have the right to conduct themselves as they wish, some of the rest of us have our natural rights to our own biological responses of revulsion. That doesn't mean we can interfere with those who do it, though. I admit I have not visited the site. But while we civilized humans undergird their rights to practice as they will in their own privacy, it doesn't require of us that we embrace it or try and identify with it or anything else. Identify with their humanity? Yes. Empathize with their natural rights? absolutely. That is all that is required of us, however.
Would it change my attitude about someone if I found out they had sex with stuffed animals? I don't see why. We're not having sex in public. And I couldn't prove that they did or didn't: I'm genuinely not interested in finding out. Since I don't have a habit of discussing personal sexual practices with people I know, I may well have been friends with someone for many years who does this, and simply never have known. It would be illogical to draw character inferences upon finding out something like this.
Again, it differs from homosexuals. If a gay guy tells me his boyfriend took him out the other night to the Japanese gardens? That's not "flaunting" as many evangelicals would call it. That is part of human interactions, human sexual partners engaging in the types of things human partners do: dates, going out, going on vacation, etc. But none would say that their stuffed animals took them out on a date, or that their stuffed creature enjoyed a particular movie or TV show.
The comparison with homosexuals simply doesn't follow.
Well, my preference for stuffed animals, is to dust them now and again with the vacuum cleaner.
I've got one dog given to me as a gift, so.
All I can say is:
"The zone is so educational!"
Now, where did I put my sand paper?
Bob